1. Introduction
KitNewCare (KNC) is a four year, multi-centre project which aims to improve the sustainability of kidney disease care across Europe.1 Renal medicine is traditionally a highly carbon intensive area, largely driven by reliance on renal replacement therapy (RRT) and organ transplantation; the project aims to reduce the environmental footprint of kidney care while improving quality, prevention, and system efficiency.
Now in its third year, KNC has thus far focused on reducing the environmental impact of kidney care delivered in secondary and tertiary settings. However, there are clear benefits to bringing primary care into the conversation; although centred on nephrology, KitNewCare’s methods are deliberately transferrable, especially to general practice, community services, and integrated care systems.2
2. Four pillars of service redesign
KNC offers a compelling blueprint for how primary care could shift from incremental optimisation to whole pathway transformation. It structures the service redesign around four pillars that are highly applicable to primary care: prevention, supported self care, leaner pathways, and clinical leadership.
2.1 Prevention
Primary care is the frontline of prevention, yet this work is often under resourced and undervalued. KitNewCare highlights the role of preventative care as central to sustainability; preventing or slowing the progression of chronic kidney disease reduces the need for dialysis, and hospitalisation with associated travel, resource use and waste.2 Through targeted screening, and intensive management of individuals at highest risk of progressive kidney disease,3 primary care can help to reduce future clinical burden, which in turn protects the finite health system capacity and avoids carbon intensive treatments associated with end-stage renal disease.
2.2 Supported self care
However, sustainability in healthcare is not achieved simply through expanding monitoring and intervention for all patients. A more personalised approach is required: identifying those most likely to benefit from proactive management, while avoiding unnecessary medicalisation of stable low risk disease, or normal ageing.4 KitNewCare emphasises empowering patients to manage long-term conditions confidently and independently, reducing unnecessary clinical contact while maintaining or improving outcomes. This aligns with growing concerns within primary care regarding overmedicalisation, expanding diagnostic thresholds, and the burden created by low value monitoring and intervention in patients at low risk of progression.5 Sustainable healthcare requires not only earlier intervention for those at highest risk, but also the confidence to safely step back where intensive medical oversight offers little meaningful benefit.1
2.3 Leaner pathways
Leaner does not mean less care, it means less wasteful care. KitNewCare applies quality improvement methodologies to remove duplication, low value steps, and unnecessary monitoring.1 In primary care this could include reviewing the content and frequency of routine blood test panels, rationalising monitoring intervals for stable long-term conditions, and reducing scheduled follow-up where it adds little clinical value.
It could also involve addressing ‘investigation cascades’, where an incidental or borderline abnormal result triggers a sequence of increasingly complex tests, specialist referrals, and repeated monitoring that may ultimately yield no meaningful change in management but increases patient anxiety, workload, and system strain.6 In primary care, cascades are particularly relevant because GPs are the entry point of diagnostic uncertainty. A test ordered with good intention in minimally symptomatic, low risk patient can generate an unexpected abnormality that is statistically likely to be benign, but clinically difficult to ignore. Over time, this can convert normal biological variation or incidental findings into a labelled ‘condition’, with resultant medicalisation, surveillance, and potential harm from overdiagnosis and overtreatment.7
A more sustainable approach in primary care therefore requires not only careful test selection, but also the confidence to interpret mild abnormalities in context, avoid reflexive escalation, and communicate uncertainty to patients. As evidenced by the findings of KNC, resisting escalation for incidental findings where further testing is unlikely to improve outcomes improves overall system efficiency and environmental footprint simultaneously.1 When done thoughtfully and with clear communication, it can be an active and patient-centred clinical decision rather than an omission.
2.4 Clinical leadership
A central tenet of KitNewCare is that the system redesign is clinician-led rather than imposed through managerial targets. Nephrologists are positioned both as leaders- helping to redefine quality and embed sustainability within professional standards- and as advocates for their patients. Drawing on their status as among the most trusted voices in society, clinicians are expected to engage patients and communities to understand why pathway change is necessary.8
For primary care, this is particularly important. Efforts to reduce overmedicalisation or unnecessary intervention will not succeed without public trust and clinical legitimacy. These changes must be explained and held within the consultation, rather than delivered as abstract system redesign. Clinicians need to be able to say, with confidence and credibility: ‘this approach is safer, kinder, and more appropriate- for you, and for the wider system on which you depend’.
3. Areas of focus for primary care
Kitnewcare advocates a four-factor framework for measuring outcomes across multiple domains, to assess the impact of change on health outcomes, financial costs, social and environmental impacts.1 This avoids the problem familiar in healthcare where gains in one domain inadvertently generate harms in another. KNC is developing benchmarking dashboards that place sustainability alongside traditional clinical indicators, reflecting the principle that clinicians cannot change what they cannot see. In a primary care context, this could mean prescribing systems that show carbon intensity alongside financial cost, referral templates that highlight high investigation burden, or decision support tools that make cascade risk more apparent.
One of the defining features of KNC is its’ explicit recognition that guidelines do not change systems; instead, pooling knowledge, encouraging collaboration and a focus on workforce education have been shown to improve outcomes.2 Primary care would benefit from a similar at-scale approach, to develop shared learning on low value prescribing and agreed norms on referral thresholds, whilst providing the collective confidence required to de-implement unnecessary care.
Crucially for overwhelmed clinicians, KNC’s approach of embedding sustainability as a key component of existing quality improvement activity also avoids the sense of additional workload.
4. Conclusion
KitNewCare offers more than a set of sustainability initiatives within nephrology; it provides a coherent framework for rethinking how high-quality, sustainable healthcare is designed and delivered. For primary care, its value lies not in direct transplantation of kidney-specific interventions, but in its broader principles: that early decisions shape downstream harm or benefit, that value must be judged across multiple domains simultaneously, and that system change is most effective when it is clinician led, visible, and embedded within everyday practice.
Taken together, the four pillars of prevention, supported self-care, leaner pathways, and clinical leadership describe a model of care that is both more restrained and more intentional. They challenge the assumption that more intervention is always better, instead reframing good practice as the ability to intervene early where it matters, hold back where it does not, and continuously reduce waste across the pathway. In doing so, they align closely with the realities of general practice, where uncertainty, multimorbidity, and constrained resources are the norm rather than the exception.
The implications for primary care are both practical and cultural. Practically, they point towards more selective prescribing, more thoughtful investigation, and more confident management of risk without automatic escalation. Culturally, they require a shift in what is recognised as ‘good care’ - moving away from activity-based measures and towards a more balanced understanding of outcomes that includes environmental and social impact alongside clinical benefit.
KitNewCare reinforces a message that resonates strongly for primary care: sustainability is not an external constraint imposed on clinical work, but a property of good clinical decision making. When care is appropriately targeted, carefully considered, and grounded in what truly benefits patients over time, it is not only safer and more efficient, but inherently more sustainable.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval and consent were not required.
AI statement
AI-based tools and technologies were not used for article content generation.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication in Open Research Europe does not imply endorsement of the European Commission.
Data availability
Article type (open letter) does not require data.
References
- 1.
lee@lee-b.dev:
CSH partners with KitNewCare to enhance kidney care across Europe - Sustainable Healthcare.2024 Mar 25 [cited 2026 May 26].
Reference Source
- 2.
Duane B, Steinbach I, Stancliffe R, et al.:
Improving the sustainability and quality of kidney health care through life cycle assessments, quality improvement, education and technical innovations: the KitNewCare approach.
J Nephrol.
2025 Jan 1; 38(1): 87–99. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 3.
Rossing P:
Risk Factors, Symptoms, Biomarkers, and Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease.
Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes.
Arlington (VA):
American Diabetes Association;
2021 [cited 2026 May 26]; 2021. : 8–12. (ADA Clinical Compendia Series). PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
Reference Source
- 4.
Kale MS, Korenstein D:
Overdiagnosis in primary care: framing the problem and finding solutions.
BMJ.
2018 Aug; 362(362): k2820. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 5.
Moynihan R, Glassock R, Doust J:
Chronic kidney disease controversy: how expanding definitions are unnecessarily labelling many people as diseased.
BMJ.
2013 Jul 30; 347: f4298. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 6.
O’Sullivan JW, Albasri A, Nicholson BD, et al.:
Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMJ Open.
2018 Feb 11; 8(2): e018557. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
| Free Full Text
- 7.
Sajid IM, Frost K, Paul AK:
‘Diagnostic downshift’: clinical and system consequences of extrapolating secondary care testing tactics to primary care.
BMJ Evid-Based Med.
2022 Jun; 27(3): 141–148. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
- 8.
EKPF participates in the Horizon Europe project ‘KitNewCare: Pioneering Transformation in Kidney Healthcare Sustainability Across Europe’|EKPF.[cited 2026 May 26].
Reference Source