Particle concentrations during the manufacturing of biobased composite polyurethane foam panels

List of Authors

  1. Antti Joonas Koivisto ,  
  2. Rossella Daniela Bengalli
    ,  
  3. Luca Ferrero
    ,  
  4. Paride Mantecca
    ,  
  5. Andrea Doldi ,  
  6. Fabrizio Ravegnani ,  
  7. Ilaria Zanoni ,  
  8. Anna Costa
    ,  
  9. Letizia Verdolotti ,  
  10. Federica Recupido
    ,  
  11. Giuseppe Cesare Lama
    ,  
  12. Alessia Nicosia
Article Authors & roles Authors Peer review record Peer review Metrics
Cite

Abstract

Background

Exposure to filler powder particles was evaluated during the manufacturing of 12 biobased nano-enabled polyurethane (PU) foam panels in a research and development facility based on a novel pilot plant technology. Particle emissions were investigated in PU foam production at weighing filler powders (GasBeton®, diatomite, and functionalized silica), 2) loading the powders into a reactive chamber and mixing, 3) casting into a foaming mold, and 4) a subsequent foaming phase, where the exposure assessment was performed for the first three phases.

Methods

Particle concentrations were measured in the near-field (NF) and far-field (FF) using online aerosol particle monitors, and particles were sampled from workplace air for gravimetric analysis and image and elemental analysis. Operational conditions were registered, including air flow measurements.

Results

Process times were in the order of 1 minute; despite the use of online instruments with time resolutions of 1 second (ELPI), it was not possible to distinguish concentrations between different powder weighing. Due to incomplete air mixing in the NF, it was not possible to assess particle loss rates. Thus, emissions could not be quantified. Process particle number and ≤ 10 μm and respirable mass concentrations were up to 31.2 #/cm 3 (pouring; average duration 1 minute; handling rate 700 g/min), 538 μg/m 3 and 140 μg/m 3 (weighing; average duration 2 minutes; handling rate 350 g/min), respectively. Maximum exposure potential was assessed for each task, assuming a continuous process. The maximum risk characterization factor was 0.4 for crystalline silica external exposure, which is considered adequately controlled. Electron microscopy analysis of particles sampled from the air confirmed the presence of filler particles, whereas ICP-OES analysis led to inconclusive results.

Conclusions

Powder filler exposure was adequately controlled during continuous and manual weighing, pouring, and casting processes when local exhaust ventilations are applied. Exposure risk to liquid components was not evaluated.

Plain Language Summary

Particle emissions during the manufacturing of 12 biobased composite polyurethane foam panels were investigated in a research and development facility. Due to process times of 1 to 2 minutes and an uncontrolled measurement environment by the use of local exhaust ventilations (LEVs), it was not possible to calculate emission rates using mass balance principles. Exposure assessment to filler particles was based on Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI) measurements, and the presence of filler particles was confirmed by analyzing collected particles by electron microscope. Gravimetric sampling was used to confirm the consistency of the ELPI measurements. Particle dispersion in the working hall was measured using online monitors at relevant locations. Maximum exposure potential for continuous processes was found to be adequately controlled when LEVs were present.

Corresponding author
Antti Joonas Koivisto
Grant information

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement Nº 101138414 (Multidimensional Integrated Quantitative Approach To Assess Safety And Sustainability Of Nanomaterials In Real Case Life Cycle Scenarios Using Nanospecific Impact Categories [INTEGRANO]).

Copyright
© 2026 Antti Joonas Koivisto (Corresponding Author, Co-Author); Rossella Daniela Bengalli (Co-Author); Luca Ferrero (Co-Author); Paride Mantecca (Co-Author); Andrea Doldi (Co-Author); Fabrizio Ravegnani (Co-Author); Ilaria Zanoni (Co-Author); Anna Costa (Co-Author); Letizia Verdolotti (Co-Author); Federica Recupido (Co-Author); Giuseppe Cesare Lama (Co-Author); Alessia Nicosia (Co-Author) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

First version published
Latest version published

Comments

Authors & roles

Antti Joonas Koivisto

ARCHE Consulting, Wondelgem, B-9032, Belgium

Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR/Physics), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland

Roles
Corresponding Author, Co-Author, Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Rossella Daniela Bengalli

POLARIS Research Centre, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, 20126, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Luca Ferrero

POLARIS Research Centre, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, 20126, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing

Paride Mantecca

POLARIS Research Centre, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, 20126, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Investigation, Project Administration, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing

Andrea Doldi

POLARIS Research Centre, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, 20126, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Data Curation, Investigation, Software

Fabrizio Ravegnani

ISAC-CNR, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, CNR, National Research Council of Italy, Bologna, 40129, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Ilaria Zanoni

ISSMC-CNR, Institute of Science, Technology and Sustainability for Ceramics, CNR, National Research Council, Faenza, 48018, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Anna Costa

ISSMC-CNR, Institute of Science, Technology and Sustainability for Ceramics, CNR, National Research Council, Faenza, 48018, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing

Letizia Verdolotti

IPCB-CNR, Institute for Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, CNR, National Research Council of Italy, Portici, 80055, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing

Federica Recupido

IPCB-CNR, Institute for Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, CNR, National Research Council of Italy, Portici, 80055, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Data Curation, Investigation, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing

Giuseppe Cesare Lama

IPCB-CNR, Institute for Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, CNR, National Research Council of Italy, Portici, 80055, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Alessia Nicosia

ISAC-CNR, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, CNR, National Research Council of Italy, Bologna, 40129, Italy

Roles
Co-Author, Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Downloads over the last 12 months:

Cited by

via Crossref

View citing articles