Sufficiency in European Climate Policies, four country NECPs analysed

List of Authors

  1. Gunnar Boye OLESEN ,  
  2. Ann Vikkelsø
Article Authors & roles Authors Peer review record Peer review Metrics
Cite

Abstract

Backgrounds

Sufficiency, a concept acknowledged by the International Panel of Climate Change (IPCC), is often not included in climate-mitigation strategies. Its elements are, however, well known in different policy areas. Thus, there are good reasons to elevate sufficiency to a central element of national and international sustainability strategies.

Methods

This article, through the lens of the FULFILL project, aims to elucidate sufficiency and evaluate its integration into climate strategies via the National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs) of four European countries: Denmark, France, Germany, and Italy. This shall offer insights into the current status of sufficiency policies and identify the best practices and areas for improvement.

The analysis is based on the studies of sufficiency policies, identifying specific sufficiency measures. This leads to the development of a comprehensive overview and comparative analysis of how the four analysed countries incorporate sufficiency within their NECPs and to proposals for additional national sufficiency policies. The analysis focuses on policies that regulate social, infrastructural, and regulatory conditions that influence individual and collective behaviours.

Results

The article presents a clear and comprehensive analysis of the current tole of sufficiency policies in NECPs and their unused potential. Sufficiency policies are introduced in the countries analysed, but far from their potential to mitigate climate change. It also shows that existing sufficiency policies are primarily aiming at changing consumption and not to reduce consumption, such as reduced transport, reduced size of buildings. Another result is that some sufficiency policies are only introduced on local level by municipalities.

Conclusion

The conclusion is that some sufficiency policies are already integrated in national climate policies but their potentials are far from exhausted while other policies are hardly used, in particular policies to reduce consumption. This gives a large potential to increase sufficiency measures to strengthen climate policies and actions.

Plain Language Summary

In this article, we compare the sufficiency policies of four countries, Denmark, France, Germany, and Italy with sufficiency policies analysed by the FULFILL project and other research. The aim is to analyse how sufficiency policies are included in national climate plans, what their potentials are to increase climate mitigation, and with which policies

The policies analysed are promoting the following sufficiency measures, divided in 4 policy areas:

Building/living spaces

Living in collective housing, cohousing, flat-sharing, limiting holiday homes, reduce requirements for parking places, urban planning for tiny houses, progressive tariffs for water and energy, move to smaller dwelling, lower indoor temperature in winter, reduce heating and light when rooms are not used, move energy use to periods with high renewable energy supply & low demand

Mobility

Carpooling, using train and public transports, bi-cycling, flying less/ban of short-haul airlines, living closer to services, working from home or a co-working space, low-emission zone for transport in large cities

Products/packaging

Sharing products, moderate product sizing, avoiding purchases (household level), reasonable usage/cutting energy waste, better repair opportunities, places for free re-use, packaging tax and regulation, single-use tax and regulation

Diets/food

Eating less meat & dairy (VAT Reduction for plant-based food), vegetarian meals in public canteens, reduce food waste

Of the 30 measures analysed, climate plans included only 7 for Denmark, 10 for France, 5 for Germany, and 9 for Italy. This indicate that there are large potentials to increase sufficiency policies in all four countries.

The FULFILL project is a European project with support from Horizon 2020 and with partners from Denmark, France, Germany, Latvia, and Italy. In the FULFILL we understand the sufficiency principle as creating the social, infrastructural, and regulatory conditions for changing individual and collective lifestyles in a way that reduces energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. Read more https://fulfill-sufficiency.eu/

Corresponding author
Gunnar Boye OLESEN
0000-0002-3580-5138
Grant information

This project has received funding from the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme under grant agreement No. 101003656 (998781550 ) (Fundamental Decarbonisation Through Sufficiency By Lifestyle Changes).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright
© 2024 Gunnar Boye OLESEN (Corresponding Author, Co-Author); Ann Vikkelsø (Co-Author) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

First version published
Latest version published

Comments

Authors & roles

Gunnar Boye OLESEN

Secretariat, International Network for Sustainable Energy - Europe, Aarhus, Midtjylland, 8000, Denmark

Roles
Corresponding Author, Co-Author, Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing
0000-0002-3580-5138

Ann Vikkelsø

Secretariat, International Network for Sustainable Energy - Europe, Aarhus, Midtjylland, 8000, Denmark

Roles
Co-Author, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Downloads over the last 12 months:

Cited by

via Crossref

View citing articles